top of page

Audience Echoes|映後留言板

Erica

香港|Hong Kong

想先表達睇完係感到有力量的,像訪問所講,做性別有時會感到孤軍奮戰,但回想起去曼谷Pride見到離散酷兒,紀錄片見到之前女權五姐妹情況,她們從失落中再重生。也看到中日韓不同爭取/推動性別模式,有時會看見前輩們年輕的身影。呢個時候會想起漫畫《關於地球的運動》(中二病發作),有種傳承的感動,哪怕每個階段都迎來挫折,但我們沒有停止過。所以在片段中我對「情感的共震」很有共鳴,覺得被感動了。 另外,看見韓國的前進,覺得愁雲慘霧的香港也該慶祝一下。 紀錄片帶給我共時性,特別是全球政治氣壓、跟再年輕一代難以交接的困難。韓國的受訪者說,以前因為英文障礙,不懂聯合國語言。對於我們這代,則是未曾了解這個機制,可能係learned helpness。 另外,常思考作為Non-binary,可以代表婦女議題嗎?在紀錄片我的名字其實可以顯示Erica/Erics (they/them) 以突顯這個性別身份和婦女議題的小角力~ 我睇嘅時候一路諗會不會就「婦女同多元性別意識割裂」有解答,期待著之際原來係由我向婦進的Mabel 問出呢個問題,覺得幾有意思。性別、民主制度、政治氣候是掛勾,在失去集體聚會或同性伴侶登記制度被取消的日子,無力感好顯然,也頓時覺得性別失去政治性。我諗會不會有個出路解答,睇完東亞不同的approach ,我有肯定到行性別教育路,都可以成就日常的性別政治,也是能連結下一代讓佢地延續性別平權概位。 另外,看見Judith Bulter提及出路,我們可以支援跨議題去培養整體公民素養。也希望之後能看到更多韓國的部分,相信他們也會畀到insights 其他地方。
First, I want to say that after watching it, I felt empowered. As the interviews put it, doing gender work can sometimes feel like fighting alone. But I think back to meeting diasporic queers at Bangkok Pride, and to seeing in the documentary what the Feminist Five went through: how they were reborn out of loss. I also saw the different ways people in China, Japan and Korea fight for and push gender issues forward, and at times I glimpsed our predecessors in their youth. In those moments I thought of the manga Orb: On the Movements of the Earth (my chūnibyō flaring up). There’s a feeling of being moved by what gets passed down: even though every stage met with setbacks, we never stopped. So I really resonated with the film’s “affective resonance,” and I was moved. Also, seeing Korea move forward, I feel gloomy Hong Kong deserves a little celebration too. The documentary gave me a sense of synchronicity, especially the global political pressure and the difficulty of handing things on to an even younger generation. A Korean interviewee said that in the past, because of the English barrier, they didn’t understand the language of the UN. For our generation, it’s that we have never understood this mechanism at all. Maybe it’s learned helplessness. Also, I often wonder: as a non-binary person, can I represent women’s issues? In the documentary, my name could actually be shown as Erica/Erics (they/them), to highlight this small tug-of-war between this gender identity and women’s issues~ While watching, I kept wondering whether there would be an answer to the “split between women’s and gender-diverse consciousness.” And while I was waiting for it, it turned out I was the one who had put that question to Mabel of the Association for the Advancement of Feminism, which I found rather interesting. Gender, democratic institutions and the political climate are bound together. In days when collective gatherings are lost and same-sex partnership registration is scrapped, the powerlessness is plain, and gender suddenly seems to lose its political edge. I wondered whether there would be a way out. Having seen the different approaches across East Asia, I’m convinced that taking the path of gender education can also make everyday gender politics possible, and can connect with the next generation so they can carry on holding a place for gender equality. Also, seeing Judith Butler speak about a way forward: we can support cross-issue work to build broader civic literacy. I also hope to see more of the Korean part in future. I believe they’ll offer insights to other places too.

KUMA🐻‍❄️

東京|Tokyo

想到2022年的上海封城。 當時有一段視頻流傳:一對年輕人因為拒絕被強制轉運隔離,被威脅說處罰會「影響三代」。那個人回答:「這是我們最後一代,謝謝。」 後來有一天,我穿著自己那件「女權主義者長這樣」的T恤,在背後寫下「我們是最後一代」,下樓去做核酸。有人從背後拍下了我的背影,照片後來在推特上被很多人轉發。 很多人看到的,只是一個上海居民在那一刻做出的一點微小反抗。但對我來說,支撐我走下樓的,不只是憤怒,還有女權主義給我的力量。 女權從來不只是關於性別。它關於每一個人。 來到東京之後,我參加了一些公共活動,比如驕傲月和國際女性日的遊行。但當我把這些照片和記錄發回牆內時,很快發現幾乎都會被屏蔽。 國內其實一直在慢慢被收緊。2015、2016年上海馬拉松還有人舉彩虹旗,但後來只要出現彩虹元素,相關物料都會被嚴格審查。 每到驕傲月或一些重要節點,活動物料都要被檢查。有家酒吧因為舉辦《陰道獨白》的劇本圍讀會,被要求關停。 影片裡提到女權主義者和LGBTQ群體的關係。在中國的現實裡,對這兩個群體的打壓往往是同時發生的。所以我覺得,我們更需要彼此連接。 其實一開始,我接觸女權主義和酷兒文化,也只是把它當作一種時尚標籤。後來經歷了一些事情——MeToo運動、弦子朱軍案、徐州鐵鏈女事件——慢慢開始看到具體的人,也知道真實發生的事情,就很難再裝作什麼都沒看到。 影片裡提到1995年的世界婦女大會,以及後來在東亞形成的這些連結,其實我以前完全不知道。說出來有點羞愧,但也讓我意識到,我們很多時候並不知道自己站在怎樣的歷史脈絡裡。 我現在在日本,也不知道還能在這裡待多久。但只要我還活著,我就會繼續發聲,把我看到的事情寫下來、記錄下來。也會把我在外面看到的世界,盡量傳遞回牆內。 就算這些信息一次又一次被封鎖,我也還是會繼續做這件事。
I thought of the 2022 Shanghai lockdown. A video was circulating at the time: a young couple who refused to be forcibly transferred to quarantine were threatened that the punishment would “affect three generations.” One of them replied: “We are the last generation, thank you.” Later, one day, I put on my “This Is What a Feminist Looks Like” T-shirt, wrote “We are the last generation” on the back, and went downstairs for a PCR test. Someone photographed me from behind, and the photo was later shared widely on Twitter. What many people saw was just a small act of resistance by one Shanghai resident in that moment. But for me, what carried me down those stairs was not only anger. It was also the strength feminism had given me. Feminism has never been only about gender. It is about everyone. After I came to Tokyo, I joined some public events, like Pride Month and International Women’s Day marches. But when I sent these photos and records back behind the Wall, I soon found that almost all of them were blocked. Things at home have been slowly tightening all along. In 2015 and 2016, people still carried rainbow flags at the Shanghai Marathon, but later, as soon as anything rainbow appeared, the materials were strictly censored. Every Pride Month, and at other important moments, event materials have to be inspected. One bar was ordered to shut down for hosting a script reading of The Vagina Monologues. The film talks about the relationship between feminists and LGBTQ communities. In China’s reality, the crackdowns on these two groups often happen at the same time. That’s why I think we need to connect with each other all the more. Honestly, when I first came across feminism and queer culture, I treated them as little more than a fashionable label. Then some things happened: the MeToo movement, the Xianzi–Zhu Jun case, the chained woman of Xuzhou. Slowly I began to see real people and to know what had really happened, and after that it became hard to pretend I hadn’t seen anything. The film mentions the 1995 World Conference on Women and the connections that later formed across East Asia. I knew nothing about any of it before. It’s a little embarrassing to admit, but it made me realize that much of the time we don’t know what history we’re standing in. I’m in Japan now, and I don’t know how much longer I can stay here. But as long as I’m alive, I will keep speaking out, writing down and recording what I see. And I will do my best to carry the world I’ve seen out here back behind the Wall. Even if this information is blocked again and again, I will keep doing this.

🍎 L

台北|Taipei

想記錄包麗事件。 在六度人際關係理論下,距離這件案子格外近,更準確是朋友被捲入其中,我和其他朋友陪伴這位朋友走過事發和後續輿論風波。 剛發生時很震驚,我們討論了很多這件事背後的成因,以及大家如何幫助包麗和她媽媽。 後續正面連結的稿件發出後,其實我們又有一些討論,因為當時在幫助包麗的朋友們覺得那篇報導中有許多不準確的地方,親屬知情不足。後續引發了很多關於新聞倫理的討論,但是對我的影響是,思考也討論了很多是否是當事人對整件事考慮的角度和在乎的事情的影響非常大,因此後續親屬和朋友團體自己發布了幾篇文章。 這件事已經過去很久,包麗也沒有醒來離開了,當時捲入的朋友也有了新的生活,但最後過了很久看到法律將包麗案列為案例,精神虐待也被列入家暴範疇。但我覺得這也不是誰勝利了,其實是失敗,她身邊的親友們永遠失去了她。但也也很感謝大家的持續努力,才會有失敗不只是失敗。 關於影片,我更多是一種理解和感覺,雖然很早就知道95世婦會後多了很多東西,現在在中國女性意識的普及也是延續在這個脈絡之下,但再次透過影片去回溯時,依舊覺得很澎湃,三十年前真的什麼也沒有欸,只有一小群人,但現在變成了很多人。 一直以來都覺得女性主義和其他不一樣之處,就是她是一門與生活和日常緊密相關的理論,或是從其中長出的理論。認同自己是女性主義的時間越久,其實日常越不會去談大的東西,是會在日常的每一個細小的選擇中做出自己更想要的選擇,比如將合作機會先給偏好的女性創作者或其他女性,我覺得這也不是我們在做什麼性別選擇,而是男性既然從小到大得到過那麼多的偏愛,那為何這一次,我可以選擇時,我不將這份偏愛給予女性呢?但也不只是這麼簡單的原因,更深層還是長期與女性的合作中,可以感受到大家互相的體諒,每個人都為對方先想一步,不希望麻煩對方,這些都會令合作更順暢一些。 在影片中看到的內容,的確可以給予我一些鼓勵,我們現在在做的一些嘗試,可能短期看不到成果,但或許也會擴散到其他地方,傳遞給一些人,這種模糊的感覺會帶著所有人走得更遠。 台北場是伍維婷老師做分享,她的經歷補齊了很多過去的脈絡,不只是在台灣,更是整個東亞。也期待有機會聽到老師更多過去參與協作的故事,我感覺友誼在其中是非常重要的。她也提及和中國的女權行動者從吵架到最後成為朋友,雖然也不是完全的彼此說服,但是大家在差異並存的情況下一起往前走。 最近兩年偶爾覺得很挫敗的是,有時候覺得大家都深陷在自己的國族,不那麼關心其他地方,但也始終覺得交流和溝通是必要的不可以停止的,這部片裡的並置是很重要的,我們也終於不總是在談單一地區的狀況,雖然大家當下可能在不同的階段,要處理的問題也不完全相同,但看到彼此也才可能有同樣的方向。
I want to record the Bao Li case. By six degrees of separation, I was unusually close to it. More precisely, a friend of mine was caught up in it, and other friends and I stayed with that friend through what happened and the storm of public opinion that followed. When it first happened, we were shocked. We talked a lot about the causes behind it, and about how everyone could help Bao Li and her mother. After the follow-up piece by Zhengmian Lianjie was published, we had more discussions, because the friends who were helping Bao Li at the time felt the report contained many inaccuracies and that her family had not been properly informed. It later set off a lot of debate about journalistic ethics. For me, though, it meant thinking and talking a great deal about whether the perspective of the people directly involved, and what they care about, matter enormously to how the whole story is told. That is why her family and the group of friends later published several pieces themselves. This was a long time ago now. Bao Li never woke up and is gone, and the friends who were caught up in it have moved on to new lives. But much later, I saw that the law had made the Bao Li case a reference case, and psychological abuse was brought within the scope of domestic violence. Still, I don’t think anyone won. It was really a failure: the family and friends around her lost her forever. But I’m also grateful for everyone’s continued efforts, which are why failure is not only failure. As for the film, what I had was more of an understanding and a feeling. I’d long known that a great deal came about after the 1995 World Conference on Women, and that the spread of women’s consciousness in China today continues within that lineage. But tracing it back again through the film, I still felt deeply stirred. Thirty years ago there truly was nothing, just a small group of people. And now there are so many. I’ve always felt that what sets feminism apart is that it is a theory closely bound up with life and the everyday, or one that grows out of it. The longer I’ve identified as a feminist, the less I actually talk about big things in daily life. Instead, in every small everyday choice, I make the choice I’d rather make. For example, I offer collaboration opportunities first to women creators I like working with, or to other women. I don’t see this as us making some kind of gender choice. Rather, since men have received so much favoritism from childhood on, why shouldn’t I, this time, when the choice is mine, give that favor to women? But it isn’t only that simple. On a deeper level, from working with women over a long time, I can feel everyone’s consideration for one another. Each person thinks a step ahead for the other and doesn’t want to put them out, and all of this makes working together go more smoothly. What I saw in the film did give me some encouragement. Some of what we’re trying now may not show results in the short term, but perhaps it will spread to other places and be passed on to some people. This vague feeling will carry all of us further. At the Taipei screening, Wu Wei-ting shared her experience, which filled in a great deal of past context, not only in Taiwan but across East Asia. I hope to have the chance to hear more of her stories of past participation and collaboration. I feel friendship mattered enormously in all of it. She also mentioned going from arguing with Chinese feminist activists to eventually becoming friends. They didn’t completely win each other over, but everyone moved forward together, with their differences coexisting. What I’ve found really frustrating at times over the past two years is the feeling that everyone is sunk deep in their own nation and doesn’t care much about other places. But I’ve always believed that exchange and communication are necessary and must not stop. The juxtaposition in this film matters a lot. At last we’re not always talking about a single place. We may each be at different stages right now, dealing with problems that aren’t quite the same, but only by seeing each other can we share a direction.

EJ

美索|Mae Sot

1995 年到 2005 年間,我在父親在場的情況下,遭到父親的弟弟性侵害。我試著告訴父親發生了什麼事,他沒有回應,只是繼續看電視。 2010 年代,MeToo 運動在南韓興起時,母親有一次說了一句話,拿我跟父親的弟弟相比。我哭著問:「妳怎麼能說我像那個性侵害我的人?」那時,母親才開始認真看待這件事。後來她問:「那段經歷沒有讓妳活得更小心一點嗎?」這時我已經能清楚辨認出,她的回應是一種二度傷害。最後,母親跟父親談過之後,這件事終於得到處理。也許南韓的 MeToo 運動,也直接或間接地影響了我們家。 在泰國美索,和來自緬甸及其他國家的朋友一起看這部片,我不禁想到,東亞的過去與緬甸的現在是多麼緊密相連。身為專注緬甸研究的博士生,我覺得非常有意義的是,正如一位中年男性觀眾所指出的,翁山蘇姬在結束六年軟禁、剛獲釋之後,就透過寄送的錄影帶在 1995 年的會議上發表演講。 身為南韓人,看到東亞各國的女性行動者如此密切地交流、互相影響,令我十分驚訝。我想起自己在 2008 年燭光集會、之後的抗議,以及青年行動者圈子裡感受到的孤單與孤立;那裡的主流論述永遠是「女性議題以後再說,先解決其他重要的事!」聽到南韓的女性行動者平靜地說,她們不一定是相連的,讓我深有共鳴,彷彿間接地被理解了。東亞的「過去」,好像正在東南亞,特別是緬甸的「現在」重演、重複。就這一點而言,能透過影片確認亞洲各地女性行動者之間的團結與溝通始終是必要的,而且事實上一直在持續,令人振奮。
Between 1995 and 2005, I experienced sexual abuse by my father’s younger brother while my father was present. When I tried to tell my father what had happened, he did not respond and simply continued watching TV. As the MeToo movement gained traction in South Korea in the 2010s, my mother once made a remark comparing me to my father’s younger brother. In tears, I asked, “How can you say I resemble the person who sexually abused me?” At that point, my mother began to take the situation seriously. When she later asked, “Didn’t that experience make you live more cautiously?” I was able to clearly identify her response as a form of secondary victimization. The situation was eventually addressed after my mother spoke to my father. Perhaps the MeToo movement in South Korea has had a direct or indirect impact on our family as well. Watching the film in Mae Sot, Thailand, alongside friends from Myanmar and other countries, I couldn’t help but think how deeply connected East Asia’s past is to Myanmar’s present. As a doctoral student focusing on Myanmar studies, I found it profoundly meaningful that Aung San Suu Kyi, as one middle-aged male attendee pointed out, delivered her speech via a sent video at a 1995 conference right after being released from her six-year house arrest. As a South Korean, it was astonishing to see how closely women activists across various East Asian countries interacted and influenced one another. I recall my own feelings of loneliness and isolation during the 2008 candlelight vigils, subsequent protests, and within youth activist circles, where the prevailing discourse was always to ‘consider women’s issues later, after other critical matters are resolved! Hearing the South Korean women activists calmly mention that they were not necessarily connected deeply resonated with me, making me feel indirectly understood. It feels as though East Asia’s ‘past’ is being replayed and repeated in Southeast Asia’s-particularly Myanmar’s-‘present’. In this regard, it was heartening to confirm through the film that solidarity and communication among women activists across Asia are continuously necessary and, in fact, ongoing.

Bauhinia × Blakeana

東京|Tokyo

2023年12月我跟一群女孩子一起公開METOO了一個性騷擾慣犯,這不是我人生第一次遭遇的性暴力,但有些事情是一個人沒辦法面對的,只有一群人在一起才有力量。接下來我們還要延續這個力量,出版小誌,進行公共對話,把能量延展開來。 每一個時代的運動者都有他們的挑戰,也都會找到自己走下去的方式。
In December 2023, a group of girls and I publicly called out a serial sexual harasser as part of MeToo. It wasn’t the first time I had experienced sexual violence, but some things can’t be faced alone. There is strength only when people come together. Next, we want to keep this strength going by publishing a zine, holding public conversations, and letting the energy spread further. Activists in every era face their own challenges, and each of them finds a way to keep going.

Lucifer

東京|Tokyo

我01年出生,今年是我從事政治活動的第10個年份了,自從2016年我參與了各種政治活動。比如Fridays For Future, 移民支援活動,巴勒斯坦解放運動等。我的童年與過去並不精彩,甚至可以說充滿了黑暗。但是我在這過去的幾年裡一直在為自己和同胞們努力創造更好的世界。我覺得很值得。 我作為diaspora,從小與中國和sinophone文化有不少脫節。很欣慰通過這部影片和這個活動了解了更多東亞地區的酷兒與女性運動。我覺得Waiting很帥哈哈哈哈
I was born in 2001, and this year marks my tenth year of political activism. Since 2016 I’ve been part of all kinds of political actions, such as Fridays For Future, migrant support work and the Palestinian liberation movement. My childhood and my past were not wonderful. You could even say they were full of darkness. But over the past few years I have kept working to build a better world for myself and my fellow people. I think it has been worth it. As part of the diaspora, I grew up quite disconnected from China and Sinophone culture. I’m glad that through this film and this event I learned more about queer and women’s movements in East Asia. I think Wei Tingting is so cool hahaha

榴莲

東京|Tokyo

關於自己,我想mark 2023年3月 8日,第一次一個人獨自去參加婦女節遊行。 影片裡印象深的話:女權主義者喜歡在沒希望的地方找希望。
For myself, I want to mark March 8, 2023, the first time I went to a Women’s Day march on my own. A line from the film that stayed with me: feminists like to look for hope where there is none.

SHIN

東京|Tokyo

忘記了具體是哪一句話,到最後問「為什麼堅持」的那一段有哽咽,有被鼓舞的感覺。
I’ve forgotten exactly which line it was, but during the part at the end that asks “why keep going,” I choked up. I felt encouraged.

👧

東京|Tokyo

Mark 2015–2026:向媽媽出櫃,也發現了女性主義,以及它如何影響了好幾個世代。 那位聾人行動者讓我印象深刻。
Mark 2015-2026, came out to my mum + discovered feminism and how it impacts so many generations Impressed by the deaf activist

Floating

東京|Tokyo

重慶那位聾人行動者讓我很受鼓舞,因為她在那麼艱難的環境裡工作,卻似乎一直保持著陽光的態度。 我也想到,自己常常對許多受訪者所表達的樂觀抱持犬儒的態度。但我真的認為,這份樂觀至關重要;而且我相信,尤其是在聽了馮媛的分享之後,過去的進展或基礎看不見,並不代表它們不重要。
The deaf activist in Chongqing was very inspiring to me because she is working in such a difficult environment, but still seems to maintain such a sunny attitude. I also thought about how I often feel cynical about the optimism many of the interviewees expressed. But I really do think that their optimism is crucial, and I do believe - especially after listening to Feng Yuan's comments - that just because previous progress or foundations are invisible, doesn't mean they don't matter

Lune

東京|Tokyo

2022年弦子敗訴是一個蠻讓我印象深刻的節點。弦子案對於我這樣的95後來說,是成長經歷中印象很深刻的,持續進行的事件。這個事件凝結的人們的抗爭心,憤怒,挫敗和不甘,以及不放棄,對我而言都是會留存下來的感受。 視聽障礙者的部分讓我印象很深刻。阻力之下仍然傳遞自己的表達,仍然積極行動。
Xianzi losing her case in 2022 was a turning point that left a strong impression on me. For someone of my generation, born after 1995, the Xianzi case was an ongoing event that left a deep mark on my growing up. The defiance, the anger, the frustration and refusal to accept it, and the refusal to give up that the case crystallized are feelings that will stay with me. The part about people with visual and hearing impairments stayed with me. Even against resistance, they still find ways to express themselves, and they still take action.

Yang XQ

東京|Tokyo

2025年春天我從東京回到上海,看到《初步舉證》在全國範圍內院線上映,那對我來說是一個重新看到中國環境在變化的時刻。一方面是曾經在工作中和生活中都為性別議題討論空間的開闊做過努力,但是多數時候都是失望再失望,而這部有觀看門檻的電影在全國的上映無疑反映了行動者努力產生的結果。另一方面是與日本的對比,我在日本也觀察到這部電影上映,但是非常小範圍,而且時間很短,幾乎沒什麼討論火花,所以回國看到之後非常激動。 看到「shanghai lockdown survivor」t恤的出現。這是我從上海帶來東京的紀念品之一。
In spring 2025 I returned from Tokyo to Shanghai and saw Prima Facie showing in cinemas across the country. For me, it was a moment of seeing again that China’s environment is changing. On the one hand, I had worked, in my job and in my life, to open up space for discussing gender issues, and most of the time it was disappointment after disappointment. A nationwide release of a film that asks this much of its audience clearly reflects what activists’ efforts have achieved. On the other hand, there’s the contrast with Japan. I saw the film released there too, but on a very small scale and for a very short run, with hardly any spark of discussion. So seeing it back home was really exciting. Seeing the “shanghai lockdown survivor” T-shirt appear. It’s one of the souvenirs I brought with me from Shanghai to Tokyo.

💝

阿姆斯特丹|Amsterdam

關於自己,可能是2017-2018年,這一年經歷了太多事情。和小夥伴們一起參與到[[陰道獨白]]的表演,又同時被取消。見到很多其他性別社群,一起交流合作。也見到和了解到影片裡前輩的經歷。:) 在講女權五姐妹和韋婷婷的分享時有想哭的感覺。感覺十幾年間又發生了太多事情,在這些簡單的文字背後大家都經歷了太多不容易的事情沒辦法細說……所以特別有感觸。
For myself, it would probably be 2017–2018. So much happened that year. With my friends, I took part in a performance of [[The Vagina Monologues]], which was then cancelled. I met many other gender and sexuality communities, and we exchanged ideas and worked together. I also got to meet our predecessors from the film and learn about their experiences. :) During the parts about the Feminist Five and Wei Tingting’s sharing, I felt like crying. So much has happened again over these ten-odd years. Behind these simple words, everyone has been through so many hard things that can’t be told in full… so it really moved me.

篮球 (Basketball)

柏林|Berlin

關於自己,想記錄母親的出軌。 她一直不願我提起,她會哭泣、道歉並且憤怒地告訴我她沒有做什麼錯事。我不知如何回應她爆發的恥辱感,但我重複告訴她我非常感謝她。我是那時才知道女人(就算非常希望,也)不能永遠順從。 關於影片,韓國政治運動那種成片的高高長長的旗非常令人印象深刻。它讓政治運動從身體的上升,甚至變成了一種精神的畫面。
For myself, I want to record my mother’s affair. She never wanted me to bring it up. She would cry, apologize, and angrily tell me she hadn’t done anything wrong. I didn’t know how to respond to the shame that would burst out of her, but I told her again and again that I was very grateful to her. It was only then that I learned that women cannot (even if they very much wish to) always be obedient. About the film: the fields of tall, long flags at the Korean political protests were really striking. They lifted the political movement up from the level of the body, even turning it into a kind of spiritual image.

加絨

台北|Taipei

放映這天是3月16日,林奕含的生日。我想標記我第一次讀完《房思琪的初戀樂園》的時刻。關於這本書的記憶和#MeToo交織在一起,雖然常常看到轉發性騷擾事件時引用書中的段落,至今仍然不敢重讀整本。 最想標記的依然是最後一個章節, Into the New World。昨天看完影片回家之後也在單曲循環寫手帳。
The screening was on March 16, Lin Yi-han’s birthday. I want to mark the moment I first finished reading Fang Si-Chi’s First Love Paradise. My memories of this book are intertwined with #MeToo. Even though I often see passages from it quoted when people share stories of sexual harassment, I still don’t dare to reread the whole book. What I most want to mark is still the last chapter, Into the New World. Yesterday, after coming home from the film, I had it on repeat while writing in my journal.

Momo

South Bay

記得導演的一句話:今天的自己也許沒有自己想的重要,但現在在做的事情對未來是有意義的。
I remember something the director said: today, I may not be as important as I think I am, but what I’m doing now matters for the future.

Nyein

美索|Mae Sot

我想分享的一個時刻,是我決定獨自撫養孩子的那時候。 那是我人生中一段艱難的時期。我經歷了情感上的孤立,也意識到我必須為自己和孩子做一個困難的決定。選擇離開一個不健康的處境、成為單親媽媽並不容易,但那成了我人生的轉捩點。 這個時刻形塑了我對韌性、女性的能動性、尊嚴,以及擁有為自己人生做決定的自由有多重要的理解。它也影響了我後來的志向:透過教育和社會工作,支持女性、年輕人和社群。
One moment I would like to share is the time when I decided to raise my child on my own. It was a difficult period in my life when I experienced emotional isolation and realized that I needed to make a difficult decision for myself and my child. Choosing to step away from an unhealthy situation and become a single mother was not easy, but it became a turning point in my life. This moment shaped my understanding of resilience, women’s agency, dignity, and the importance of having the freedom to make decisions about one’s own life. It also influenced my later interest in supporting women, young people, and communities through education and social work.

😈

海牙|The Hague

2019年香港同志遊行,大陸的朋友被打電話要求不被允許前往。 Tingting在影片中提到的,我們這一代對95世婦的了解不多,了解之後知道了這麼多內容。那現在00後,是不是也和我們一樣,不知道曾經我們在過去經歷過什麼樣的故事。但這些,都值得被講述。
At Hong Kong Pride in 2019, friends from the mainland got phone calls telling them they were not allowed to go. As Tingting says in the film, our generation knew little about the ‘95 World Conference on Women, and only after learning about it did we realize how much there was. So now, are those born after 2000 just like us, not knowing the stories we lived through in the past? But all of these stories deserve to be told.

向日葵 (Sunflower)

溫哥華|Vancouver

2015年,還在上高中的我,第一次認識到了我們的同齡人在做這麼勇敢的事情(女權五姐妹)。世界開始不再是純白一片,我意識到了gender的問題,和無處不在的inequality 我很喜歡結尾關於是什麼讓你堅持的大家的回答,並且沒有一個人想過放棄,大家都認為要做些什麼,堅持下去,改變是慢慢發生的。
In 2015, when I was still in high school, I realized for the first time that people of our generation were doing something so brave (the Feminist Five). The world stopped being spotless and simple; I became aware of gender issues and of the inequality that is everywhere. I really loved everyone’s answers at the end about what keeps them going. Not a single person had ever thought of giving up. Everyone believed in doing something and sticking with it. Change happens slowly.

Rainbow

阿姆斯特丹|Amsterdam

感覺1995年最開始是最難的,完全在黑暗中摸索。影片裡印象最深的是中日韓女權運動的連接,像在電影裡提到的,這種連接的力量是巨大的。你不是孤身一人,許許多多的人和你一樣在不同的地方為同樣的事情搖旗吶喊。
I feel that the very beginning, in 1995, was the hardest, groping completely in the dark. What stayed with me most in the film was the connection between the feminist movements in China, Japan and Korea. As the film says, the power of this connection is immense. You are not alone: so many people, in different places, are raising their flags and their voices for the same things, just as you are.

🧵K

墨爾本|Melbourne

印象非常深刻的是一場未完成,或者說到現在也還在ongoing的對話,是香港兩位不同代際的見證者,聊這兩個不同年代人們做事情的不同方式,從推進立法式的,到現在可能更偏文青的方式。 社會環境的不同可能也決定了我們做事情的方式也在變化。也很好奇,或者說還想追問,這些變化給我們帶來了什麼?又會讓我們失去什麼?希望有機會還能看到更多這樣代際間的對話發生。
What stayed with me most was an unfinished conversation, or rather one that’s still ongoing, between two witnesses from different generations in Hong Kong, about the different ways people of these two eras do things: from pushing for legislation, to what might now be a more artsy, cultural approach. A different social environment may also mean that the way we do things is changing. I’m curious, or rather, I want to keep asking: what have these changes given us? And what might they make us lose? I hope there will be chances to see more conversations like this between generations.

🔮sylvia

墨爾本|Melbourne

就我的經歷來說,我是 2000 年後出生的,只能說我經歷過的運動大多在 2020 年前後。大家都知道那時發生了什麼;白紙和小花梅迫使我去思考女性的權利和社會地位。 作為商學院的碩士生,你們的電影對我來說是很好的素材,讓我把社會面向和經濟面向連結起來。觀影時,我無法忽視:投身女權運動和酷兒運動的女性,會受到這個父權體制的經濟懲罰,程度可能各有不同。如果你深度投入這些運動,不論有沒有被抓,你未來的職涯都不明朗,你會一直承受痛苦、不斷掙扎。
In my experience, since I was born in the 2000s, I can only say that most of the movements I experienced were around 2020. We all know what happened then; the blank paper and Xiaohuamei forced me to think about women’s rights and social position. As a master’s student in business school, your movie is good material for me to connect social aspects to economic material. While watching, I can not ignore that those women who engage in the feminist movement and queer movement face an economic penalty from this patriarchal system, potentially at different levels. If you engage deeply in these movements, whether you are caught or not, your future career is not clear, and you will always suffer and struggle.

🔥

墨爾本|Melbourne

想要記錄2026年4月18日。那天我們在社群活動進行中第一次遇見了很大的挑戰。一直以來在社群內做活動,在行動中體會社群建設種種滋味。但那天我才具身意識到,在那以前,我們就是在某種舒適圈內。那天以後,進行了很多次行動反思,作為組織者,作為活動設置,作為我們內心立場,我們還可以做得更好,我們此刻做不到的等等。 我們如何構建更安全的環境?又如何面對社群內部不同的看法和行為?當我們看見對其他成員會產生傷害的行為時,我們如何明確立場?但又怎麼能保證我們的立場不是傲慢與偏見?我想那一天會一直跟隨到我們到很遠的以後。 每一步都算數。 如果沒有前人堅持不懈的努力,也就沒有我們今日的光景。這激勵我們繼續向前,想看看世婦會四十週年時,又是什麼樣。但沒有人應該孤單地獨自前行,無論我們對未來的期待長什麼樣,我們每個人在行動中扮演的角色是什麼,都應該知道,我們決不是孤身一人。
I want to record April 18, 2026. That day, in the middle of a community event, we faced a major challenge for the first time. We had always run events within the community, tasting all the ups and downs of community-building through action. But that day I realized, in my body, that until then we had been inside a kind of comfort zone. After that day, we reflected on our actions many times: as organizers, on how we set up events, on our inner positions; on where we could do better, and on what we can’t yet do. How do we build a safer environment? How do we face differing views and behaviors within the community? When we see behavior that could harm other members, how do we take a clear stance? And yet how can we be sure our stance isn’t arrogance and prejudice? I think that day will stay with us for a long, long time. Every step counts. Without the tireless efforts of those who came before us, we wouldn’t have what we have today. This encourages us to keep going, to see what things will look like at the 40th anniversary of the World Conference on Women. But no one should have to walk alone. Whatever our hopes for the future look like, and whatever role each of us plays in the action, we should all know that we are never alone.

Kiki

阿姆斯特丹|Amsterdam

關於自己,想記錄2016年,因為我在大學參與了人生中第一次LGBTQ的活動,是新世界打開的大門。 希望新世代能繼續做這件事情,只要不停下來,我們就會一直在彼此身邊。
For myself, I want to record 2016, because that was when I took part in my first-ever LGBTQ event, at university. It was the door opening onto a new world. I hope the new generation will keep doing this. As long as we don’t stop, we’ll always be by each other’s side.

Peanut

清邁|Chiang Mai

我對日本一位女權行動者的話感到共鳴:是憤怒讓我堅持下來了。
I resonated with what a Japanese feminist activist said: it was anger that kept me going.

Tina

斯德哥爾摩|Stockholm

大概是 2017 年夏天吧?我搭火車從柏林前往阿姆斯特丹。坐在旁邊的女士把她帶上車的餅乾分給我,作為回禮,我也把自己帶的杏仁分給她和她的孩子們。她剛從敘利亞搬到德國,正在學德文;但我其實不太懂德文,她的英文也不多(當然更不會我的母語瑞典語)。不過我們靠著微笑和彼此都懂的詞語溝通,還在紙上寫下各自的出生年份,原來我們年紀相近。我想分享這一刻,因為那是與陌生人一次美好又意外的相遇:兩個女人,往返於兩個都不是自己家鄉的國家之間,年紀相仿,卻來自全然不同的地方、過著全然不同的人生,盡力去理解彼此。 看電影時,我感覺到淚水從臉頰滑落。看到人們不顧各自國家之間緊張的官方關係,依然攜手合作,我非常感動。也許最讓我受到鼓舞的,是看到日本女性站出來為「慰安婦」爭取賠償:她們違逆社會常規,與曾被自己國家虐待的女性站在一起。為自己的權利挺身而出很重要,為他人的權利挺身而出也同樣重要!
Summer, maybe 2017? I was on the train from Berlin to Amsterdam. The woman next to me offered me cookies she had brought for the train. In return, I shared the almonds I had brought with her and her kids. She had recently moved from Syria to Germany and was learning German, but I don’t really know German, and she didn’t know much English (and of course not Swedish, my mothertongue). But we communicated with smiles and the words we shared, and wrote our birth years on paper. We were close in age. I wanted to share this moment because it was such a lovely, unexpected meeting with a stranger. Two women going between two different foreign countries, close in age but from totally different places and lives, trying our best to understand each other. I felt tears running down my cheeks while watching the movie. I was so touched seeing individuals work together despite the tense official relationships between their respective countries. I was perhaps especially inspired by seeing Japanese women stand up for reparations for “comfort women”, for going against social norms in solidarity with women who have been mistreated by their country. It’s important to stand up for our own rights, but also for the rights of others!

岩崎

科隆|Köln

我想可能對我觸動最深的應該是waiting的表達吧。 我自己同樣作為一個在中國大陸性少數社群幫忙和長期活動的人,現在在白紙後逃來德國生活。雖然我經常戲謔自己是「逃兵」,國內的朋友還在最前線戰鬥,我卻躲在這裡為了生計,又一直找不到自己的位置,最後只能在這「風花雪月」的生活,這樣的情況其實每次讓我參與社群活動,聯繫以前國內朋友的時候都會產生羞恥感。但是真的,你不可能說一件你投入了很多年精力的事情,出來之後你就可以完全「退出」,至少我自己是做不到。 所以看到韋婷婷最後那個欲言又止的表情,我完全就理解ta想表達什麼了,因為有些事情只有在當地才能做,我出來之後我發現我以前做的事在這裡全都不需要了,譬如幫助那些庇護所裡的跨女,出來之後直到現在其實我對於這個戰鬥方式的轉換是很無所適從的。就有點像有人以前在台灣戒嚴時期發光發熱,但是民主化之後他們的做法反而變得不那麼被新世代的人接受一樣。 我一直很喜歡法白(法律白話文)的劉珞亦說的「每個人都有自己的戰鬥位置」。 有的行動者很會表達,有的人希望對於關心的議題去遊行請願,那我出來後能力用不上,我就賺錢捐錢總可以吧,捐錢也很重要啊,只是要接受自己在這裡沒有能力幫不上忙、過去的經驗完全用不到這件事在心理上是很有落差的。這也是為何我很關注這個紀錄片中出現的過去的行動者的現狀,因為我很能從ta們的無奈中得到共鳴。 這種很無奈又不想放下和關心的事情的聯繫的狀態是我非常能感同身受的,真要用一個詞來形容就是「Die Hard」,我沒辦法真的去在心態上完全的風花雪月,因為我沒法忘記我是從哪裡來的,我受過哪些人的幫助,我幫過哪些人,以及我仍然想做下去的想法。我想這種狀態可能是很多離散海外的行動者都會遇到的。
I think what moved me most was probably what Tingting expressed. Like her, I’ve long helped out and been active in sexual minority communities in mainland China, and after the White Paper protests I fled to live in Germany. I often joke that I’m a “deserter”: my friends at home are still fighting on the front line, while I hide here making a living, still unable to find my place, left with nothing but a life of “wind, flowers, snow and moon,” a life of idle leisure. Every time I take part in community activities or get in touch with old friends at home, this situation makes me feel ashamed. But honestly, you can’t take something you’ve poured years of your life into and just “quit” it completely once you’ve left. At least I can’t. So when I saw Wei Tingting’s expression at the end, as if she wanted to say something but held back, I understood completely what they meant. Some things can only be done on the ground. After I left, I found that the things I used to do aren’t needed here at all, like helping trans women in shelters. From the time I left until now, I’ve been at a loss over how to change the way I fight. It’s a bit like people who shone during the martial-law era in Taiwan, whose ways of doing things became less accepted by the new generation after democratization. I’ve always loved something Liu Luo-yi of the Plain Law Movement said: “Everyone has their own position in the fight.” Some activists are great at speaking out; some want to march and petition for the issues they care about. Since my skills are no use now that I’ve left, I can at least earn money and donate, right? Donating matters too. It’s just that accepting that I can’t help here, and that my past experience is of no use at all, leaves a real gap inside. That’s also why I pay close attention to how the past activists in this documentary are doing now: I deeply resonate with their helplessness. This state of feeling helpless yet unwilling to let go of my ties to what I care about is something I know deeply. If I had to sum it up in one phrase, it would be “Die Hard.” I can’t truly settle into a carefree, wind-flowers-snow-and-moon frame of mind, because I can’t forget where I came from, who has helped me, whom I have helped, and that I still want to keep doing this. I think this is a state many activists in the diaspora run into.

星

斯德哥爾摩|Stockholm

美國 2020 的 BLM movement 讓我初次接觸 intersectionality 這個概念,讓我更理解不同群體所受的壓迫之間的聯繫,亦讓我反思自己的經歷、身份和特權。 我很感謝攝製團隊製作這部紀錄片,聯繫和疏理不同時空的東亞女權運動。雖然近年的網路性暴力和極右翼思潮讓我感到焦慮,但這部電影讓我看到一路以來女性如何奮力爭取權益和自由,給予我力量。我亦很感謝一起看完這部紀錄片的各位。
The BLM movement in the US in 2020 was what first introduced me to the concept of intersectionality. It helped me better understand how the oppressions faced by different groups are connected, and it made me reflect on my own experiences, identity and privilege. I’m very grateful to the film team for making this documentary, which connects and maps out East Asian feminist movements across different times and places. Although online sexual violence and far-right currents in recent years have made me anxious, this film showed me how women have fought all along for their rights and freedom, and it gave me strength. I’m also grateful to everyone who watched this documentary together with me.

王政 Wang Zheng

-

我看了很感動,不僅是因為看到當年熱血沸騰的各國婦女如今已白髮蒼蒼卻依然執著於自己的追求,更因為從片子中看到了青年一代不亞於前輩的執著追求,包括紀錄片製作者。跨國徵集史料和訪談極其不易,我既感動又欣慰。片中最讓我動容的是Waiting談自己得知各國婦女支持後的感受,處理得非常好。在影片長長的無語無聲中我流淚了。我真希望你們能再做一部,把當初提議和操辦這件大事的各國人物挖掘出來,讓後人知道她們。看我這個歷史學者總是對被遮蔽被遺忘的歷史人物念念不忘。當然那會更難。恐怕一些人已經作古。只是個願望。
I was deeply moved, not only because the women from many countries who were so fired up back then are now white-haired and still devoted to their pursuits, but also because the film shows a younger generation every bit as committed as those who came before them, the filmmakers included. Gathering historical materials and interviews across borders is extremely hard, and I feel both moved and gratified. What touched me most was Tingting describing how she felt when she learned of the support from women in other countries. It was handled beautifully. During the film’s long stretch of wordless silence, I cried. I truly hope you will make another film that brings to light the people in each country who first proposed and organized this great undertaking, so that later generations will know them. As a historian, I can never stop thinking about the historical figures who have been obscured and forgotten. Of course, that would be even harder. I fear some of them have already passed away. It is only a wish.

小黃

東京|Tokyo

作為一個從2015年報導女權五姊妹開始,一直在關注和報導中國性別議題和女權運動的記者,看到了後來成為朋友的行動者和許多其他受訪者非常受觸動;我想到我們共同經歷的十年整個運動、其中的個體,我自己這十年間的成長、變化和掙扎,以及我們共同面對的越來越糟糕的政治環境。看到最後東亞的不同世代女權主義者都說要堅持、所有的一切成果都來自一代一代人的鬥爭,真切感受到女性無國、只有彼此。
As a journalist who has followed and reported on gender issues and the feminist movement in China ever since covering the Feminist Five in 2015, I was deeply moved to see activists who later became my friends, and many other interviewees. I thought about the decade of the movement we lived through together and the individuals within it; about my own growth, changes and struggles over these ten years; and about the ever-worsening political environment we face together. Seeing feminists of different generations across East Asia say at the end that they will persist — that every achievement comes from the struggles of one generation after another — I truly felt that women have no country, only each other.

欣宜

柏林|Berlin

有幾個難以忘記的瞬間:一位受訪者說「我們學會了聯合國的語言」;一位台灣行動者把大會資料裝進行李箱帶回去,因為「台灣沒有」;還有人把性別暴力命名,做成可以抽取、閱讀、傳遞的卡牌。 我一直在想這句話,「學會聯合國的語言」。首先,這意味著那不是她們的語言,她們必須先學會它,才能把經驗放進去,才能被聽見。這句話同時指向兩件事:進入的可能、和進入的代價。其中有策略與妥協——將具體、身體性的經驗抽象為會議室中可討論的概念,必然伴隨損耗;也有一種尊嚴——我願意付出這樣的代價進入你的語言,因為我的經驗需要進入更大的脈絡,成為記憶。 三十年前的大會,和三十年後的追尋,都圍繞著「記憶」展開。記憶並不自然生成,對邊緣者而言,經驗不會自動沉澱為歷史,不會自然轉化為願景,甚至難以連續存在。它更常見的狀態,是不斷發生、不斷消散。而上述這些瞬間所呈現的,正是對「製造記憶」的渴望:學習一種語言,是為了讓經驗進入脈絡;把資料帶回去,是因為經驗不會自行抵達「別處」;將暴力做成卡牌,是為了讓命名不至消失,而能被持有、被傳遞。 這樣的渴望之動人,也是因為所有人都清楚:[[我們並非沒有歷史,只是歷史不會主動為我們書寫。]]我們的經驗默認不會被保留。於是,所有行動都指向一個面向未來的想像:會有一個「之後」,一個「別處」,一個尚未相遇的人,需要這些經驗。 而紀錄片本身,也是這種行動與想像的一部分。
There were a few moments I can’t forget: an interviewee saying “we learned UN language”; a Taiwanese activist packing conference materials into her suitcase to take home, because “Taiwan doesn’t have these”; and someone naming gender-based violence and turning it into cards that can be drawn, read and passed on. I keep thinking about that phrase, “learning UN language.” First of all, it means this was not their language. They had to learn it before they could put their experience into it, before they could be heard. The phrase points to two things at once: the possibility of entering, and the cost of entering. There is strategy and compromise in it: abstracting concrete, embodied experience into concepts that can be discussed in a meeting room inevitably means something is lost. And there is also a kind of dignity: I am willing to pay this price to enter your language, because my experience needs to enter a larger context and become memory. The conference thirty years ago and the search thirty years later both revolve around “memory.” Memory does not form on its own. For those on the margins, experience does not automatically settle into history or naturally turn into vision; it can struggle even to persist. More often, it keeps happening and keeps dissipating. What the moments above reveal is precisely a longing to “make memory”: learning a language so that experience can enter a context; carrying materials home because experience won’t reach “elsewhere” by itself; turning violence into cards so that the naming won’t vanish, but can be held and passed on. This longing is moving because everyone knows: it’s not that we have no history, only that history will not write us in on its own. By default, our experience will not be kept. And so every action points toward an imagined future: there will be an “after,” an “elsewhere,” someone not yet met, who will need these experiences. And the documentary itself is part of this action and this imagination.

酷雞

墨爾本|Melbourne

我是一名18歲的中國女性,我參加了在墨爾本大學的放映會。現在距離影片放映結束已過去了半個小時,但我內心中所感受到的觸動一直沒有平息。 在觀看這部影片之前,我幾乎對東亞和中國的女性平權運動一無所知。因為從未被提起。我曾經上過西方女性解放史的課程,那是按照浪潮劃分的,有結構和成效的女性解放運動。學完後我就對自己國家在這方面的「空白(當時我一無所知)」感到很失望。因為這一份知識的空缺,讓我一度懷疑中國的女性是活在暗無天日、無處逃脫的父權制結構下,被制度、法律等種種限制遏制住了發展。 直到今天,從影片中,我第一次了解到1995年在北京召開的世界婦女大會,也了解到至少在十年前,有很多來自世界各地的人為中國的女性平權運動作出努力。直到現在,女性平權的聲音也沒有消失,只不過是沒有暴露在我可以看到的地方。 從影片中,我看到了在主流西方女性運動中被邊緣化的東亞國家們,是如何在掙扎中讓女性的權益不再被忽視,讓這個世界越來越好。 我從中感受到了莫大的力量。從前,我一直沒有想好自己是否要成為一個女權主義者,因為我所接觸的社交媒體無一不把女權塑造成一種極端的思想。現在,那股全東亞女性聯合起來,向著更光明、更女性友好、更美麗的未來的力量,讓我有很大的「讓我也做點什麼吧」和成為女權主義者的衝動。就像影片中的第五個部分,我也想貢獻自己的一份力量,一起團結著和女士們,走向更光明的世界和未來!
I’m an 18-year-old Chinese woman, and I came to the screening at the University of Melbourne. It’s been half an hour since the film ended, but what stirred in me still hasn’t settled. Before watching this film, I knew almost nothing about the movements for women’s equality in East Asia and in China, because they were never mentioned. I once took a course on the history of Western women’s liberation, a structured, effective liberation movement divided into waves. After finishing it, I felt very disappointed by my own country’s “blank” in this area (I knew nothing at the time). Because of this gap in knowledge, I once wondered whether Chinese women were living under a pitch-dark, inescapable patriarchal structure, their development held back by the system, the law and all kinds of restrictions. Only today, through the film, did I learn for the first time about the World Conference on Women held in Beijing in 1995, and that at least ten years ago, many people from all over the world were working for women’s equality in China. Even now, the voices for women’s equality haven’t disappeared; they just haven’t been visible anywhere I could see them. Through the film, I saw how the East Asian countries marginalized within mainstream Western feminism have struggled to make sure women’s rights are no longer ignored, and to make the world better and better. I felt an immense strength from it. Before, I had never made up my mind about whether to become a feminist, because every social media platform I’d encountered portrayed feminism as an extreme ideology. Now, the strength of women across East Asia joining together toward a brighter, more woman-friendly, more beautiful future has given me a strong urge to say “let me do something too” and to become a feminist. Like the fifth part of the film, I want to contribute my own share, and, united with the women, walk toward a brighter world and future!

Jie

台北|Taipei

2020,我親身經歷家暴,並且打求助熱線。但自己第一反應還是「我刺激了對方」,是我的錯;並且不斷為對方找理由,用了很久才恢復以自己為本位的感受和思考。當時在疫情中,十分封閉絕望,反女性暴力熱線和網路上的各種信息給了我相當大的力量。 如果我沒有記錯,一開始幾位受訪者的信息都是95年世婦會參與者,到回顧的時候,她們的身份才一一揭曉,這個對比十分震撼。有幾位檢察官和律師看起來就跟身邊的阿姨嬸嬸無異,沒想到三十年前在會議上那麼意氣風發、呼籲振聾發聵。 台北場伍老師在現場語氣輕鬆的分享,也非常震撼,將這三十年的歷史用幽默娓娓道來。我本來以為大家會討論很多困境,用革命的敘事來回顧歷史,結果感受到的都是大家真心而溫柔的愛,迎難而上的勇氣,和緩慢的、但不曾熄滅的希望。
In 2020, I experienced domestic violence myself and called a helpline. But my first reaction was still “I provoked him,” that it was my fault, and I kept making excuses for the other person. It took me a long time to get back to feeling and thinking from my own center. It was during the pandemic, and I felt completely shut in and hopeless. The anti-violence-against-women hotline and all kinds of information online gave me a great deal of strength. If I remember correctly, at the start of the film several of the interviewees appeared simply as participants at the 1995 World Conference on Women, and only when the film looked back were their identities revealed one by one. That contrast was stunning. A few prosecutors and lawyers looked just like the aunties around us; I never imagined that thirty years ago, at the conference, they were so full of spirit, with calls that rang out loud enough to wake the deaf. At the Taipei screening, Ms. Wu’s relaxed, easygoing talk was also incredibly powerful. She told the story of these thirty years with humor, unhurriedly. I had expected people to discuss lots of difficulties and to look back on history through a revolutionary narrative. Instead, what I felt was everyone’s sincere and tender love, the courage to face hardship head-on, and a slow but never-extinguished hope.

TOMATO

東京|Tokyo

想Mark 2022年。跟朋友們一起做鐵鏈女的海報。 影片中受觸動的是松井耶依 雖然她已經不在了,但是非常感念她做的女性法庭,去年查戰爭性暴力資料的時候了解到她做的這些事情
I want to mark 2022, when I made posters about the chained woman with my friends. What moved me in the film was Matsui Yayori. Although she is no longer with us, I'm deeply grateful for the Women's Tribunal she organised — I learned about her work last year while researching wartime sexual violence.

PEAR

東京|Tokyo

2015年左右,上大學接觸了女權,從此有了不同的看世界的角度。 印象深刻的是韓國的那英說她繼續抗爭的理由是It’s my duty. 我們享受了前人的抗爭結果,我們的任務就是記住與carry on.
Around 2015, I encountered feminism at university, and since then I’ve seen the world from a different angle. What stayed with me was Na-young from Korea saying that the reason she keeps fighting is “It’s my duty.” We have enjoyed the fruits of the struggles of those who came before us; our task is to remember and carry on.

阿煒

東京|Tokyo

2026 活在當下 更好理解與女性主義母親的關係 亦更好理解與日本另一半的兩性關係 我與另一半都很喜歡「悲慘世界」所以聽到中國女權版的DO YOU HEAR THE PEOPLE SING 頗為感動
2026: living in the present. I understand my relationship with my feminist mother better, and also the gender dynamics in my relationship with my Japanese partner. My partner and I both love Les Misérables, so hearing the Chinese feminist version of “Do You Hear the People Sing” was quite moving.

くじら🐳WHALE

東京|Tokyo

我是2000年出生的,生理性別男。直到2015都沒有關注過這個世界。看到Part5. 標題名是 다시 만난 세계 (Into The New World) . 就大概猜到了彈劾尹錫悅會被提到. 這個Part最後的字幕裡提到了「社會邊緣人」,雖然不會韓文,但是我知道在台灣在2024年末2025年初,也有很多想要把自己的國家變得更好的人會被攻擊成是「社會邊緣人」. 而妳們的作品在告訴我們,正是被稱作「社會邊緣人」的人們不放棄地做點什麼,讓這個世界變得更好了一點點。感謝妳們的documentary.
I was born in 2000, biologically male. Until 2015, I had never paid attention to this world. When I saw Part 5, titled 다시 만난 세계 (Into the New World), I could more or less guess that the impeachment of Yoon Suk-yeol would come up. The subtitles at the end of this part mentioned “social outcasts.” I don’t know Korean, but I know that in Taiwan in late 2024 and early 2025, many people who wanted to make their country better were also attacked as “social outcasts.” And your work tells us that it is precisely the people called “social outcasts” who, by refusing to give up and doing something, have made this world a little bit better. Thank you for your documentary.

火龙果

東京|Tokyo

想要標記影片中出現的2024年9月在東京進行的反對deepfake色情內容的聲援韓國抗議活動,許多平時在做不同的事情、並沒有那麼熟悉的夥伴們在那一天同時默默地站出來表達憤怒,共同為了同一件關心的事情重新匯聚到一起,這樣的團結是非常重要的女權時刻 想標記韋婷婷說的在建國門地鐵站和女權之聲擦肩而過的瞬間,還有香港的同志遊行,來自東亞許許多多地區的機構、小組一同出現在街上。很喜歡這種川流交匯相聚,再四散開各自努力的感覺。
I want to mark the protest in Tokyo in September 2024, shown in the film, held in solidarity with Korea against deepfake sexual content. On that day, many friends who usually work on different things and don’t know each other that well all quietly stood up to express their anger, coming together again around something we all cared about. That kind of solidarity is a really important feminist moment. I also want to mark the moment Wei Tingting described of brushing past Feminist Voices at Jianguomen subway station, and the Hong Kong Pride parade, where organizations and groups from so many parts of East Asia appeared on the street together. I love this feeling of streams converging and meeting, then scattering again, each going back to their own work.

芦荟 (Aloe)

東京|Tokyo

2018年metoo運動所引起的後續各種微博上的性別議題的討論。讓我意識到我自己之前覺得不對勁的和不能忍受的那些對待和事件,不是我的問題,是很多只要處在邊緣地位上的人們都普遍遇到的,大家共享同一套反思痛苦掙扎和批判,藉由媒體,精神和經驗進行了連結和共鳴。 我對於大家提到的行動的動力是憤怒這件事非常共情和共鳴。對我來說憤怒不是一個負面情緒,而是我的黑色生命力,是活著的生切感受,也是繼續行動和創作的生命源動力。
The discussions of gender issues on Weibo that followed the 2018 MeToo movement made me realize that the treatment and incidents I had felt were wrong and unbearable were not my problem. They are common to so many people in marginal positions. We shared the same reflection, pain, struggle and critique, and through media, our spirits and experiences connected and resonated. I deeply empathize and resonate with what people said about anger being what drives action. For me, anger is not a negative emotion. It is my black life force, the raw, vivid feeling of being alive, and the source of energy that keeps me acting and creating.

🐬

東京|Tokyo

Makiko-san就面前,輕輕柔柔地說,1995年她還是一個工程師,因為感到不對勁想去參加大會看看,在北京認識了NHK的記者(松井耶依),因為這個契機她辭職去海外修讀女性學,做女性行動者,30年後坐在一個空間看這個紀錄片想起了當年的經歷。 朋友說媽媽在1996年離婚,沒準是和95年之後大家開始討論家暴的概念有關,那時候才知道原來經歷的東西叫作家暴。 還有片中韓國的受訪者說,婦女運動會支持社運,但是民主社運並不一定會支持婦女運動的議題。
Makiko-san, sitting right in front of me, said softly that in 1995 she was still an engineer. Sensing that something wasn’t right, she wanted to go to the conference and see for herself. In Beijing she met an NHK journalist (Matsui Yayori), and that encounter led her to quit her job, study women’s studies abroad, and become a women’s activist. Thirty years later, sitting in a room watching this documentary, she remembered what she had lived through back then. A friend said her mother got divorced in 1996. Perhaps it had something to do with people beginning to talk about the idea of domestic violence after ‘95. Only then did she learn that what she had been through had a name: domestic violence. And a Korean interviewee in the film said that the women’s movement will support social movements, but democratic social movements won’t necessarily support the women’s movement’s issues.

Peregrine

阿姆斯特丹|Amsterdam

很喜歡一位韓國受訪者回答"what kept you going"時說的,女性現在的所有權利都是抗爭得來的,停止抗爭,這些權利就會再度被侵蝕。 讓我想起國內女性主義受到的打壓與反覆,政治上的壓制導致女權運動變得分散化和私密化,我們很難再有組織地在公共空間表達和倡導,某種程度上,也導致了女性權益很難直接地通過政治上施壓來推進。但另一方面,日常的女性主義概念已在新一代女性心中扎根,我們變得對公共空間厭女的表達更敏感,也在利用法律和輿論對侵犯女性權益的行為做出反抗。更廣泛人群觀念的變化可能是這十年比較大的成果。
I really liked what a Korean interviewee said in answer to “what kept you going”: all the rights women have now were won through struggle, and if we stop struggling, these rights will be eroded again. It reminded me of the repression and setbacks feminism has faced at home. Political suppression has made the feminist movement more dispersed and more private. It’s very hard for us to express ourselves and advocate in an organized way in public space anymore, and to some extent this has also made it hard to advance women’s rights directly through political pressure. But on the other hand, everyday feminist ideas have taken root in a new generation of women. We’ve become more sensitive to misogynistic expression in public space, and we’re using the law and public opinion to push back against violations of women’s rights. The change in the views of a much wider population may be the biggest achievement of this decade.

Bright

阿姆斯特丹|Amsterdam

2022年,一個朋友向我分享了她被教授性騷擾的經歷。 之後,我們一起在校內社群和網絡上分享了這段經歷,並且迅速聯繫到了其他的受害者,這是一個跨越了幾大高校、持續數年的性騷擾事件。我們和受害者一起整理了材料(包括該加害者承認自己性騷擾的錄音),並且向紀委提交了舉報材料。整個過程非常的漫長與艱難。[最後,這位教授被開除了。] 我對其中提到的rupture深有共鳴。當我最開始接觸到女權主義思想的時候,我根本不知道前人的存在。一切都是真空的。或許十年後,下一輩的女權主義者也會有相同的感受。非常感謝這樣一部紀錄片。女權主義者從未斷代,每一代的女權主義者都在不懈地努力,或許在不同的時間,在世界的不同角落。 無論外界的壓迫如何,女權主義的火星永不熄滅。聚是一團火,散作滿天星。
In 2022, a friend told me about being sexually harassed by a professor. Afterwards, we shared what had happened in campus groups and online, and quickly got in touch with other victims. It turned out to be a case of sexual harassment spanning several major universities and lasting for years. Together with the victims, we compiled evidence (including a recording of the perpetrator admitting to the harassment) and submitted a formal report to the Discipline Inspection Commission. The whole process was long and very hard. [[In the end, the professor was dismissed.] I deeply resonated with the “rupture” the film talks about. When I first encountered feminist ideas, I had no idea that anyone had come before us. Everything felt like a vacuum. Perhaps ten years from now, the next generation of feminists will feel the same. I’m so grateful for a documentary like this. Feminists have never been broken off from one another: every generation of feminists has kept working tirelessly, perhaps at different times, in different corners of the world. However hard the pressure from outside, the spark of feminism will never go out. Together we are a blazing fire; scattered, we are a sky full of stars.

Sharon

-

我出生在1996年,2015年我接觸女權思想的時候聽說過女權之聲和肖美麗,她們扮成新娘抗議的事情還上了新聞。那真是中國一個難得相對開放有這樣的空間的時刻
I was born in 1996. When I first encountered feminist ideas in 2015, I heard about Feminist Voices and Xiao Meili; their protest dressed as brides even made the news. That really was a rare moment in China, when things were relatively open and there was space for something like that.

Jade

墨爾本|Melbourne

非常喜歡前面對歷史的整理和敘述,讓我認識了許許多多前輩,也得知原來還有這樣一段思想浪潮,原來開始並不是現在這樣,原來她們也曾如此團結地鬥爭過。 最觸動的其實是轉向backslash時,女權五姐妹被捕,接著各大微博帳號公眾號被封,發聲空間被越擠越小。這些壓抑痛苦才是我熟悉的環境,看到這裡反而有一種哦我回到現實了的感覺。我是2021年在大陸讀大學,當我開始接觸不同觀點生長自主意識時,身邊土壤早已變得十分貧瘠。大四時,參加一個活動輾轉加了學校的性少數社團,也是那時才知道有這樣一個組織。再後來,之前帶我一起在校內發放衛生巾、宣傳反月經羞恥的朋友,想在校內組織遊行爭取權益。卻在前一晚,被群裡人舉報,接著不讓帶手機被領導請去喝茶,後來,Ta的朋友圈便修飾成了要給領導看的歌頌版本。 最初知道這件事時,我感到驚訝、害怕,又覺得意料之中……現在想來,當時這個朋友的遭遇激起了我內心的恐懼,開始將我的憤怒和想要參與發聲的願望壓抑。我想要做些什麼,卻不知道要做什麼。就像影片最後說的「無力感」,很多人離開,留下的人覺得自己還不夠資歷,卻也要開始培養新人。中國女權運動的斷代令人氣餒和無力,而作為在這斷代裡生長的人,我一直覺得想要逃離,不知該如何表達出自己被壓抑的憤怒和悲傷。 但原來,在那片土地上,還有一群又一群人走過這樣的路,知曉她們的存在,對我來說,此刻就是極大的鼓舞。
I really loved how the first part of the film gathers and tells the history. It introduced me to so many predecessors and showed me that there had been a whole wave of ideas like this, that it didn’t start out the way things are now, that they too once fought together in such solidarity. What moved me most was actually the turn to backlash: the Feminist Five were arrested, then major Weibo accounts and WeChat public accounts were shut down, and the space to speak out was squeezed smaller and smaller. That repression and pain is the environment I know; watching this part, I felt something like, “Oh, I’m back in reality.” I started university in mainland China in 2021, and by the time I began encountering different views and growing a sense of my own agency, the soil around me had long since become very barren. In my fourth year, through an event, I found my way into my university’s LGBTQ society, and only then did I learn that such an organization existed. Later, a friend who had once handed out sanitary pads with me on campus and campaigned against period shame wanted to organize a march on campus to fight for our rights. But the night before, someone in the group chat reported them. They were made to leave their phone behind and were “invited to tea” by the administration. Afterwards, their WeChat Moments were edited into a version full of praise, for the administrators to see. When I first found out, I felt shocked and afraid, and yet it was what I’d expected… Looking back now, what happened to this friend stirred up fear in me, and I began to suppress my anger and my wish to take part and speak out. I wanted to do something, but I didn’t know what. Like the “powerlessness” the film talks about at the end: many people have left, and those who stayed feel they don’t yet have enough experience, yet they have to start training newcomers. The rupture in China’s feminist movement is disheartening and leaves you feeling powerless, and as someone who grew up inside that rupture, I’ve always wanted to escape, not knowing how to express my suppressed anger and grief. But it turns out that on that land, group after group of people have walked this road before. Knowing they exist is, for me, right now, an immense encouragement.

Mango

香港|Hong Kong

這是跟我來自相同世代、相同文化背景的女權主義者在嘗試行動時所面對的一連串問題—— 如何回望世婦會、如何理解中國女權脈絡、如何看待2010年代較寬松時期的行動空間、後來如何離散、香港發生什麼、台灣發生什麼、海外社群如何延續、東亞女權如何…… 對我來說,串連起電影線索的不是時間,是試圖在歷史和現實之間尋找自己的位置,試圖在更不確定的時代通過各種形式的連結去理解和解決問題。 另外我很喜歡影片裏一些情緒性的瞬間。比如重慶那座橋的鏡頭,音樂突然輕盈起來;還有棕櫚樹和海的那一幕。那些在資料與訪談之間穿插的畫面,讓我感覺到你們作為創作者在面對這些歷史和現實的時候,情緒的重量或釋放。 那部分很動人,就是會感覺到有人在跟我一起看這些。
This is the chain of questions that feminists from my generation and my cultural background face when we try to act: how to look back on the World Conference on Women, how to understand the lineage of Chinese feminism, how to view the room for action during the relatively looser period of the 2010s, how people later dispersed into diaspora, what happened in Hong Kong, what happened in Taiwan, how overseas communities carry on, how East Asian feminism… For me, what threads the film together isn’t chronology. It’s the attempt to find one’s own place between history and the present, and the attempt, in ever more uncertain times, to understand and work through problems by connecting in all kinds of ways. I also really loved some of the emotional moments in the film. For example, the shot of the bridge in Chongqing, where the music suddenly turns light; and the scene with the palm trees and the sea. Those images woven in between the archival material and the interviews let me feel the weight, or the release, of emotion you carried as filmmakers facing this history and this present. Those parts were really moving. It felt like someone was watching all this together with me.

YA

東京|Tokyo

2018年的metoo吧,我是01年出生的,在2018年之前一直都生活在性別友好的同溫層下,直到metoo讓女權議題走進網絡體系. 關於同性戀酷兒的幾個片段,我自己是女同(雖然出櫃成功,家人理解),但還是這方面的感觸更深一些,性別問題在中國大陸還是可見的,近幾年還是有一些小小的推進,但同性戀在大陸大概只能是僅被允許存在。
The 2018 MeToo, I suppose. I was born in 2001, and before 2018 I had always lived inside a gender-friendly bubble, until MeToo brought feminist issues into the online world. The segments about gay and queer people. I’m a lesbian myself (I came out successfully, and my family understands), but those parts still struck a deeper chord with me. Gender issues are still visible in mainland China, and there’s been some small progress in recent years, but on the mainland, homosexuality can probably only be permitted to exist, nothing more.

Peach

阿姆斯特丹|Amsterdam

影片當中的很多事件包括女權五姐妹以及 Metoo 運動,貫穿了我在20-30歲這個階段對於女權主義的理解與故事。 很感動在荷蘭重新看到這段故事,感謝你們在一個記憶被不斷抹去的時代,保留重要的歷史記憶,這樣一代又一代的女權主義者不用站在荒蕪的土地上一次次從頭開始建設。
Many of the events in the film, including the Feminist Five and the MeToo movement, run through my understanding of feminism, and my own story, across my twenties. I was very moved to see this story again in the Netherlands. Thank you for preserving important historical memory in an age when memory keeps being erased, so that generation after generation of feminists won’t have to stand on barren ground and start building from scratch, again and again.

miu

墨爾本|Melbourne

讓我印象深刻的是 Xiaotong 在映後問答中提到的,拍這部片的其中一個挑戰:檔案資料的匱乏或流失。 我目前是博士生,研究印度的女性主義與酷兒檔案,這一點讓我非常有共鳴。我開始這項研究,部分原因是想了解屬於我自己的女性主義歷史,卻不知道從何開始。另一個原因是,我發現很多文獻記錄要不是已經遺失,就是在地下室和櫃子裡積灰。在和檔案工作者、女性主義行動者交談時,我聽說很多檔案資料其實要到西方,特別是美國的檔案館和圖書館才找得到。而且「檔案」直到最近才進入公共的女性主義論述,儘管記錄一直都是女性主義工作的重要部分。
What struck me was what Xiaotong said during the Q&A about one of the challenges of making the film: the lack or loss of archival materials. I am currently a PhD student researching feminist and queer archiving in India, and this resonated strongly with me. I began my research partly because I wanted to know my own history of feminism, but I didn’t know where to start. Another reason was that I realized that a lot of documentation had either been lost or was collecting dust in basements and cupboards. While talking to archivists and feminist activists, I was told that a lot of archival materials were actually to be found in archives and libraries in the West, particularly in the US, and that it is only recently that “archives” has entered public feminist discourse, even though documentation has always been an important part of feminist work.

Jeanne

阿姆斯特丹|Amsterdam

2025,選擇性別研究專業並來到荷蘭。這是我人生中一次重要的轉折,也是開始系統性了解feminism的歷史、流派、學者的一年。對我來說在一篇篇閱讀和寫作中感覺到和世界各地的女性、LGBTQ群體站在一起。改變從來都不是空中樓閣,而是從過去到現在、再到未來無數人的努力。正如電影裡這些做著「微小」事情的女性,[[從世界各地匯成江河湖海]]。 回想起曾經有一節課我們一起讀Narayan的文章產生了一種強烈的共振,我和菲律賓裔女生向大家分享了我們跟母親的隔閡,我們的荷蘭同學也感受到了那份無法跟親人產生真正意義的溝通,並且在第三世界國家時常被外界攻擊說是「外來勢力」的那份難過,她對我說:「It must be so hard」。 那一刻覺得我們因為feminism共同鏈接,跨越了種族、地域、身份,這大概就是有人在觀影後提到的連接,它誕生於共識、共情和彼此理解之中,是如此珍貴。
2025: I chose to study gender studies and came to the Netherlands. It was an important turning point in my life, and the year I began learning systematically about feminism’s history, schools of thought and scholars. For me, reading and writing piece after piece, I felt that I was standing alongside women and LGBTQ communities all over the world. Change is never a castle in the air; it comes from the efforts of countless people, from the past to the present and on into the future. Like the women in this film doing “small” things, [[from all over the world, flowing together into rivers, lakes and seas]]. I remember one class where we read Narayan together, and it set off a strong resonance. A Filipina classmate and I shared with everyone the distance between us and our mothers. Our Dutch classmate, too, could feel the sadness of being unable to truly communicate with family, and of being constantly attacked as “foreign forces” in Third World countries. She said to me: “It must be so hard.” In that moment I felt we were connected through feminism, across race, region and identity. This is probably the connection someone mentioned after the screening: it’s born of shared understanding, empathy and understanding one another, and it is so precious.

🍋

奧克蘭|Auckland

對我來說,是在 2014–15 年左右開始認識「慰安婦」議題。它讓我的憤怒有了方向,指向一個具體的女性主義議題。 關於影片: 1. 香港同志遊行上,每個參與團體報上自己名字的那一刻。 2. 那位韓國行動者說,女權團體常常支持社會運動,但反過來卻不然。這句話非常深刻。 3. 看到東亞各地的團體以不同方式在女性主義議題上推進,令人驚嘆。影片把這些故事連結得非常好。
For me, it was learning about comfort women issues around 2014- 15. It directed my anger towards a specific feminist issue. Regarding the film: 1. Hong Kong Pride parade, when each of the participating groups said their name. 2. When the Korean activist said that feminist groups often support social movements but not the other way around. It was very profound. 3. Amazing to see the different ways groups in East Asia have progressed on feminist issues. The film was able to connect these stories so well.

Irynizis

斯德哥爾摩|Stockholm

最讓我有共鳴的,是我們需要不斷思考,如何培養、準備下一代的行動者。與此同時,運動也會隨著所處時代的現實而轉變。由此延伸出一個間接相關的想法:我注意到很多電子遊戲和手機遊戲(AI 生成內容在其中也推了一把)強化了對女性的物化和性別刻板印象。而這又是遊戲開發產業由男性主導的結果。我們可以如何以建設性的方式對抗這一點?
The part that resonated with me the most was that we need to constantly think about how we can train and prepare future generations of activists. At the same time, movements get transformed according to the realities of their time. A reflection, indirectly related to that: I notice that a lot of video or mobile games (not without the help of AI-generated content) reinforce the objectification of women and gender stereotypes. This, in turn, is supported by the dominance of men in the game development industry. How can we combat that in a constructive way?

❄️

墨爾本|Melbourne

我們這代人的所謂「啟蒙時刻」似乎是斷裂的,它們在時序上大致可分為兩類:一類是自我探索相關的社會事件,引發一種模糊的正義感。它通常沒有固定時間點,而是散落在密集的時間段內。 對我而言,這類啟蒙,政治上大概是2016-17這段時間;而女權主義的啟蒙要稍早一些。來源是微博、人人網、跟早期微信公眾號的一些分析貼文。 而第二類是有清晰時間點可追溯的:在被社會事件喚醒模糊的正義感後,對這類議題願意花更多時間去探索,從而在史料、紀錄片、甚至前輩夥伴的講述中,猛然發現埋藏在過去的那個所謂「決定性」的事件,是怎樣在你無知覺的生命前半,暗中塑造你所處的環境,暗中促進那些模糊地啟蒙過你的文字,暗中注定了這種需要花一些力氣的探索過程,暗中把你塑造成現在的形狀。 女權主義的決定性事件大概就是九五世婦會了。對我來說,女權主義的這第二個決定性時刻,是這次的觀影。 另外,北京行動綱領對女權運動如此重要,甚至後來很多會議依舊以北京+命名,但真實生活在北京的我們,卻對此保持一種近乎純淨的無知狀態。我不是環境領域的行動者,但我仍聽說過哥本哈根氣候協定,我(與在場的大多數夥伴一樣)自認是一個關注女性議題的人,甚至很多夥伴是行動者,在這場觀影前,竟對這場會議毫無了解。
My generation’s so-called “moments of awakening” seem to be fractured. In time, they fall roughly into two kinds. The first comes from social events tied to self-exploration, which spark a vague sense of justice. These usually have no fixed point in time; they’re scattered across a dense stretch of time. For me, this kind of awakening was, politically, probably around 2016–17; my feminist awakening came a little earlier. The sources were Weibo, Renren, and analytical posts on early WeChat public accounts. The second kind can be traced to a clear point in time. Once a social event has woken that vague sense of justice, you become willing to spend more time exploring these issues. Then, in historical materials, in documentaries, even in the stories told by older comrades, you suddenly discover that so-called “decisive” event buried in the past, and how, in the first half of your life when you knew nothing of it, it quietly shaped the environment you lived in, quietly fostered the writing that vaguely awakened you, quietly set in motion this exploration that takes real effort, and quietly shaped you into who you are now. For feminism, the decisive event is probably the ‘95 World Conference on Women. For me, this second decisive moment of feminism was this screening. Also, the Beijing Platform for Action matters so much to the feminist movement that many later conferences are still named “Beijing+”, and yet those of us who actually lived in Beijing remained in a state of almost pristine ignorance about it. I’m not an environmental activist, but I’ve still heard of the Copenhagen climate accord. I (like most of the others there) consider myself someone who cares about women’s issues, and many of them are activists, yet before this screening we knew nothing at all about this conference.

团子 (Dango)

東京|Tokyo

我雖然也有關注社會問題、女權主義和運動這方面的話題,但很長時間以來,我更多是一個外圍的存在,或許是出自於一種自我保護的意識,或許也是因為個人的力量過於渺小,難以對抗巨大的社會體制。但今天看了這部影片,我覺得受到了很大的激勵。尤其是看到大家在最後對於「是什麼令你堅持」的回答,我也很希望以現在作為一個開始,今後我不願停留在外圍,想要盡可能地突破自己,加入到行動之中。我們的未來還是需要我們自己去改變的,吧。 我覺得是2015年五個女孩子的片段。她們雖然經歷了體制對於她們的傷害與暴力,但覺得大家的表現還是很隨和幽默。我很難想像她們具體經歷了什麼,但她們的態度很可愛,也很令人尊敬。其實除了這個片段還有很多令我忍不住眼淚的片段,感覺大家都好努力,很感動。
Although I’ve followed social issues, feminism and activism, for a long time I stayed on the periphery. Maybe it came from an instinct for self-protection, or maybe it was because one person’s strength felt too small to stand up to such an enormous social system. But watching this film today, I felt greatly encouraged. Especially when I saw everyone’s answers at the end to “what keeps you going,” I wanted to make right now a beginning. From here on, I don’t want to stay on the periphery. I want to push myself as far as I can and join the action. Our future is still something we have to change ourselves… I think. For me it was the part about the five girls in 2015. Even though they went through harm and violence at the hands of the system, I felt they all came across as easygoing and funny. I can hardly imagine what exactly they went through, but their attitude was lovely and truly admirable. Actually, besides this part, there were many others that brought me to tears. Everyone is trying so hard. I was really moved.

XiaoHan

法蘭克福|Frankfurt

我非常喜歡並且認同電影裡的一句話:不要把自己看得太重要。映後導演說,拍完後明白,不止有我們遇到了困難,我也才意識到好像近十年東亞女權運動都遇到了瓶頸,包括國內的「賽博女權」現象,紀錄片把我這些年經歷的困惑和痛苦用很平靜的方式梳理了一遍,讓我知道很多痛苦是可以用文字以及影像的方式展示出來。 我之前生活在北京,很多年前在酒吧裡結識了五姐妹中的一人,從那之後一直關注著她的社交動態,看到她現在在海外和老婆領了證,真心為她感到高興,也知道一切都不容易。 認識她的時候是大概2016年,那會我大學剛畢業,第一次接觸女權運動。2020年,作為一個近乎於旁觀者的人,見證了北京的朋友開性少數空間,從遭到舉報被迫關店到改名重啟的全過程,再到現在被威脅又一次面臨閉店,一切就像坐過山車一樣。我也生氣也難過,除此之外也不知道能做些什麼。 就像電影裡那句話,我也經常告訴自己:別把自己看得太重要。 今年年初和朋友們一起製作了一套少數群體親密關係的卡牌,我們在網上眾籌到了足夠的啟動資金後,負責人馬上被警察打電話詢問並且被禁止售賣,這一次我也不知道自己能做什麼,彷彿一切努力都白費了。但後來有小夥伴說在西南某地一家性少數酒吧裡看到有人在使用我們的卡牌時,心情還是非常的開心,起碼有人看到了! 我那一刻覺得自己一些微不足道的努力,那個在歷史洪流中不那麼重要的自己,非常的有力量!
I really love, and agree with, a line from the film: don’t see yourself as that important. After the screening, the director said that only after making the film did they understand that it wasn’t just us who had run into difficulties. I, too, only then realized that feminist movements across East Asia seem to have hit a bottleneck over the past decade, including the “cyber feminism” phenomenon at home. The documentary laid out, in a very calm way, the confusion and pain I’ve lived through these years, and it showed me that so much pain can be expressed through words and images. I used to live in Beijing. Many years ago I met one of the Five Sisters at a bar, and I’ve followed her on social media ever since. Seeing that she has now married her wife overseas, I’m truly happy for her, and I know none of it has been easy. I met her around 2016, when I had just graduated from university and was encountering the feminist movement for the first time. In 2020, as someone who was almost a bystander, I watched friends in Beijing open a space for sexual minorities and saw the whole process: being reported and forced to close, reopening under a new name, and now being threatened and facing closure once again. It’s all been like a rollercoaster. I’m angry and I’m sad, and beyond that I don’t know what I can do. Like that line in the film, I often tell myself: don’t see yourself as that important. Early this year, some friends and I made a deck of cards about intimacy and relationships in minority communities. As soon as we had crowdfunded enough start-up money online, the person in charge got a call from the police questioning them, and was barred from selling the cards. This time, too, I didn’t know what I could do. It felt as if all our effort had been for nothing. But later a friend told me they’d seen people using our cards at a queer bar somewhere in the southwest, and I was still so happy. At least someone saw it! In that moment I felt that my small efforts, and this self that isn’t so important in the great current of history, have real power!

Fun

溫哥華|Vancouver

對自己有意義的時間段想要標記2015-2026,我真的參與到中國女權行動的一個時間段。 影片中想標記女權五姐妹被捕後講述自己經歷時候的笑容,有一種鼓舞人心的resilience。
As a period of time that means something to me, I want to mark 2015–2026, the stretch when I truly took part in feminist action in China. From the film, I want to mark the Feminist Five’s smiles as they recounted what they went through after their arrest. There’s an inspiring resilience in them.

You

舊金山|San Francisco

女權五姐妹唱歌和跳舞好打動我,因為ta們在絕望的政治環境中仍然不放棄,讓我也覺得在痛苦的時刻也更有希望了
The Feminist Five singing and dancing really moved me, because even in a desperate political environment, they still didn’t give up. It made me feel that there’s more hope, even in painful moments.

Keep going.
Stay connected.
繼續前行,繼續看見。

Tungyufilm@gmail.com
Instagram: @collectivedrifting

 

© 2026 by the returning tide.

 

bottom of page